Marteladas

January 24, 2006



Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Obviously you didn't get to parse the javascript links :-)
I guess web 2.0 (which behaviour cames to mind) will make this even harder.
The doctype of the pages was at least consistent with the quirks mode?

Wednesday, January 25. 2006 at 09:25 (Reply)

Browser's mimetype beahviour, specially in iframes and link hrefs, etc, is another interesting discussion topic. If count 3 if...elses in that layer in my code :-)

And we also have the classic mimetype's ignore mode for images where you can have a .gif file served which is in fact a JPEG. Even if the server sends 'image/gif' and the file extension is .gif the browser will still not trust you and will read the first bytes of the image just to make sure, and will display the JPEG.

I wonder the spaghetti code on the engines to deal with this and much more. Hope the browser's industry learned their lesson. Let's see how IE7 complies.

Wednesday, January 25. 2006 at 11:18 (Link) (Reply)

This is also interesting:

http://code.google.com/webstats/index.html

Wednesday, January 25. 2006 at 11:25 (Link) (Reply)


Read the disclaimer first
Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA 1CAPTCHA 2CAPTCHA 3CAPTCHA 4CAPTCHA 5


 
 

Codebits

Semantic Me

Recent Twits

Quicksearch

Calendar

« December '08 »  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Categories

Archives