Google Talk Federation Update

August 31, 2005

A presumed developer from Google posted a message on the Jabber Developer's mailing list stating that Google will indeed (and as expected) open XMPP's S2S feature claiming that they are still finishing the code for it and will first test it with a closed list of partners. No estimate date was announce for the public availability. Assuming it's true, it's good news. On related news this whole Google Talk S2S thing started a huge thread regarding SPIM on both the jdev list and the JSF's Standards-JIG list and anti-SPIM proto JEPs are popping up as we speak.

Technorati Tags: jabber, google

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

drebes: +

drebes's Homepage

Olá,

Tenho acompanhado seu blog desde que, de alguma forma, cheguei a este post há uns meses, e a respeito do suporte à federação Jabber no GTalk, acho que é interessante lhe enviar esse link, que atualiza de certa forma a situação:

http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/archives/2006/01/telnet_federati.html

Monday, January 16. 2006 at 18:06 (Link) (Reply)

Celso: +

Celso's Homepage

Oi, o Pedro Melo é meu colega de trabalho BTW

O federation.google.com ainda não está aberto ao público. Aparentemente estão a fazer testes com o domain corporativo google.com. gmail.com continua fechado.

Thanks.

Monday, January 16. 2006 at 18:41 (Link) (Reply)

drebes: +

drebes's Homepage

Esses gajos do SAPO sempre a frente...

Bom, em todo caso, já devem estar sabendo da última:

http://ralphm.net/blog/2006/01/17/gtalk_s2s

Tuesday, January 17. 2006 at 17:00 (Link) (Reply)

Read the disclaimer first

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_. Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above:
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry